|
Your birth mark is how you died. Ladies and gents, Confirmation bias. In post form. Our dear Dr jim tucker is a psychiatrist and Professor of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences at the University of Virginia School of Medicine. So you know he had the best resources...oh..He used the failed work on reincarnation by ian Stevenson. In which everything he claims has no evidence. His claims rely on hypothetical evidence he made up himself. To ensure we know he's a moron. He enjoys adding quantum mechanics to his claims. He made up his standards of proof based on interviews. Interviews with people who claim past lives. That can be symptomatic of common bipolar mania. His questions are highly leading. Guiding his "patient" to a desired outcome. Claiming to have studied reincarnation and published a collection of 40 years on the subject. He has not one proven case. Ian Stevenson was this guys mentor. Critics of him include claims that the children or parents interviewed by Stevenson had deceived him, that he had asked them leading questions, that he had often worked through translators who believed what the interviewees were saying, and that his conclusions were undermined by confirmation bias. Despite all the claims made. What they really came up with was a multitude of excuses as to why they are right. You just can't prove it. Sorry. That's feeling. Not science. And this is garbage. Not science. A birthmark is a congenital, benign irregularity on the skin. And in this case. It lets a paranormal nut request nude photos of you for "science" keep your clothes on and your head straight .
http://skepdic.com/stevenson.html https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ian_Stevenson https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_B._Tucker https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/happiness-in-world/201210/the-problem-reincarnati on https://www.livescience.com/7737-reality-reincarnation.html
0 Comments
The UFO incidents go back to 2004 and have been floating the web since 2014 off and on. But now these classified naval UFO encounters have been confirmed real by the pentagon! So about that. Ever wondered how classified UAP footage gets released by the guy who could not stay in blink 182? Punishment for leaking confidential information can be half a century in prison. So. Who leaked? Two funny things. One. "FLIR," "GOFAST" and "GIMBAL" were never classified. They were the worst kept secret in the navy. Which leads us to number two: the chain of custody on these are shady. With the to the stars academy of music " go fast" tic tac video having been previously hosted on a German special effects site. so what do we have? Junk. It's unknown, yes. Because they have not ruled out such fun as equipment error, operator error, natural phenomena, mistaken identity or new test craft. The "experts" on this as aliens are just bad. Louis Elizondo? An investigation by the intercept found there is no discernible evidence that he ever worked for a government UFO program, much less led one. To the stars academy is an entertainment cooperative that sells music and merch for Angels and airwaves. Having published nothing and having a shady history with shifty loans from a fake hot dog company that just so happens to share their address?. Skeptic concerns for these videos are so prevalent they are on the incident wikipedia pages. Until they are dismissed conclusively you can't say aliens. I could say myself and three friends were anal probed. But a skeptic would point out we shared an upside down bar stool
https://www.wired.com/story/what-is-up-with-those-pentagon-ufo-videos/ https://theintercept.com/2019/06/01/ufo-unidentified-history-channel-luis-elizondo-pentagon/ https://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/pentagon-ufos-to-the-stars-academy-ttsa-ufo-media-https://medium.com/@matthewoneil/tom-delonge-is-a-scam-artist-98bf2274c37a http://parabunk.blogspot.com/2018/05/ttsa-following-money.html You admit you could be a head in a vat! You have faith in reality. FAITH!...*insert convoluted mental gymnastics and worthless philosophy* SO GOD THING=REAL. No. No that's not how it works. Now I know the head in a vat is a favorite of the likes of Neil Degrass Tyson and Matt Dillahunty. But I loathe it deeply. A pathetic journey into fiction to serve as a segway into an argument so full of philosophical nonsense you need a masters degree in dead deep thinkers just to follow. As far as I'm concerned simulated reality is the pet lunacy of the otherwise intelligent. So let's put that pet down. In a paper published in the journal Science Advances, Zohar Ringel and Dmitry Kovrizhi show that constructing a computer simulation of a particular quantum phenomenon that occurs in metals is impossible. doubling the number of particles would mean doubling the computing power required. If, however, the complexity grows on an exponential scale – where the amount of computing power has to double every time a single particle is added – then the task quickly becomes impossible. So if its impossible to create a computer capable of presenting the quantum Hall effect in metals, then a system capable of representing all life and physics would have to be infinitely expanding constantly. If you want to be ridiculed you can point out that a system simulating our world would not be constrained by physics. In that case I recommend to you either church or a mental health facility. As both are fine locations for the deranged. As you wish to reach for the unreachable it may as well be god. Or your own ass through a straight jacket.
https://cosmosmagazine.com/physics/physicists-find-we-re-not-living-in-a-computer-simulation https://futurism.com/sorry-elon-physicists-say-we-definitely-arent-living-in-a-computer-simulatio n https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/yp3b7w/we-dont-live-in-a-simulation |
|
